img
icon Maneuver Warfare Collection
icon

Maneuver Warfare & the MAGTF

We need to know if the Marine amphibious brigade is bringing enough antiarmor firepower to the battlefield.

Soviet doctrine calls for a multiechelon combined armor-mechanized attack on a wide front covered by a rolling barrage of artillery fire. Soviet artillery is covered by forward air defense batteries. Initial MAGTF supporting arms fires will (a) cause Soviet armor to button up to avoid casualties

Read More icon
icon

Seven Principles of Soviet Tactical Doctrine

Only through throwing off the role of ineffectual response. . . and seizing the tactical initiative himself may the friendly commander . . . emerge the victor.

The examination of the principles of Soviet tactical doctrine has shown them to be individually and collectively directed at the creation of combat conditions that deprive the opponent of tactical initiative and allow the Soviet commander to set the time, place, and terms of battle. This seizure of

Read More icon
icon

Let’s Learn From Everybody

Letter to the Editor

by SSgt C. Slipetsky * I enjoyed the June issue, but one article has really gotten under my skin. “Why the German Example?” by Mr. Lind was a fine article,

Read More icon
icon

Defending Maneuver Concepts

Tactics

To understand maneuver warfare concepts, it is necessary to make the basic distinction between tactics and techniques. Techniques are those things that all armies must learn to do well in order to succeed, e.g., movement to contact, assault on a fortified position, and weapons proficiency. Tactics

Read More icon
icon

Phantoms, Intruders, and Marines

Aviation Structure

Navy fighter aircraft would be used primarily to defend the carrier task forces. Any Navy fighter support provided to the Marines under these circumstances would be fleeting and shallow in depth. Navy A-6 and A-7 aircraft might appear overhead the ground forces if the carriers are in range. But,

Read More icon
icon

Maneuver Warfare

Letter to the Editor

by Maj G.I. Wilson, USMCR Col Bruce Brown’s “Maneuver Warfare Roadmap” (Apr-May82) has contributed significantly to the dialog regarding current tactics and doctrine in light of the recent interest in

Read More icon
icon

Mechanization: United or Divided?

Reshaping the Corps

I'm concerned tool After reexamining a pair of articles ("Let's Watch Where We're Going," June81, and "Reexamining Maneuver Warfare," Apr82), I am convinced there exists among us a vocal minority of officers who are either resistant to innovative change or who are less-than-thoroughly familiar with

Read More icon
icon

More Readings On Maneuver Warfare

Letter to the Editor

by Col P.G. Collins * In a recent edition of the GAZETTE, you refer to a reading list that was printed on maneuver warfare in the Books [section] in the

Read More icon
icon

Why the German Example?

In this century, only Germany endeavored to make every element of its military supportive of maneuver warfare.

Holland Smith accurately described the type of speedy fighting done by marines in the Marshalls. "The technique of infantry-tank teams pushing rapidly forward," he said "closely followed by demolition and flame thrower teams is concurred in by this Headquarters as sound." He wished, however, to

Read More icon
icon

Rommel’s Maxims Revisited

The principles given below quite naturally do not deal with the "nuts and bolts" of small-unit tactics. When [Rommel] formulated them he was, after all, an army commander and not a company commander. Along with the change in point of view, it is also interesting to note the similarities between

Read More icon
icon

Communications Training

Letter to the Editor

by SSgt P.L. Stokes CWO-2 Lavender’s Current Training and Maneuver Warfare (Feb82) was right on target! … I have been in several CPXs where one of the main concerns of

Read More icon