Defending the ‘Maneuverists’
Letter to the Editorby LtCol M.D. Wyly Recent letters and short articles in the GAZETTE purporting to counter the concepts of maneuver warfare are going wide of the mark. The tendency has been
Read Moreby LtCol M.D. Wyly Recent letters and short articles in the GAZETTE purporting to counter the concepts of maneuver warfare are going wide of the mark. The tendency has been
Read Moreby Col Bruce G. Brown, USMC(Ret) I am not a disciple of William S. Lind nor do I agree with all that he has written on maneuver warfare. However, it
Read Moreby LtCol J.R. Phaneuf, USMC(Ret) The appearance of articles by Maj Skipper and Capt Klepper relating to the logistical ramifications of maneuver warfare in the Jan82 issue was particularly encouraging.
Read Moreby LtCol J.P. Glasgow, Jr. . . . LtCol Batcheller’s commentary on Officer Competence (Jan82) resurfaced many of the traditional complaints concerning the inequities and uncertainties of the present manpower
Read Moreby Maj C. J. Gregor It has been interesting to observe all the deference and praise heaped on Mr. Lind as some modern master of military thought and analysis. It
Read Moreby Capt L. A. Robinson Mr. Lind insists on beginning many of his thought provoking articles in the GAZETTE on maneuver warfare (Mar80, Sep81, et al.) by suggesting that Marines
Read Moreby Capt L. A. Robinson Mr. Lind insists on beginning many of his thought provoking articles in the GAZETTE on maneuver warfare (Mar80, Sep81, et al.) by suggesting that Marines
Read MoreA reply and challenge to some of Gen Trainor's comments.
Read MoreA reply to Col Bruce G. Brown's article, "Tally Ho-pounce or heads up?*"
Read MoreA response to Fite's September article demonstrating positives of the current AWS curriculum.
Read MoreA reply to Lind's defining maneuver warfare article. The author calls for the Marine Corps to rise to the challenge.
Read More